An Analysis of Murtha's Moronic Behavior
Posted: 22 Jun 2008 03:46 PM CDT
J. D. Pendry
Two years ago I wrote an article titled On Your Hands. I wrote it on the same day that I received in my email internet photographs of the mutilated bodies of Private First Class Kristian Menchaca, 23, of Houston and Private First Class Thomas L. Tucker, 25, of Madras, Oregon.
I reached the point where I could no longer tolerate the insane babble coming from the mouths of certain politicians who clearly and daily place their politics ahead of the well-being of the men and women the majority of them voted to send to war. Now, the article appears to be making its umpteenth lap around the internet (wish I had a nickel for each time it has been re-posted somewhere) only this time one of the unauthorized editors of it decided it would be better if I was identified as a USMC Sergeant Major.
I have been soundly chastised by some for questioning Congressman John Murtha’s Marine credentials in the commentary. It seems I stepped over a line. I am told that since I have never been a Marine, I have no right to question what type of Marine Murtha was, is or is not. I understand pride in ones service so I apologized, but recalling the few Marines I encountered during my years of service, ABSCAM Jack did not measure up. Semper Fidelis (Always Faithful) did not seem to be his motto, unless we are speaking of faithfulness to self and to his political cronies. I even apologized to the Marines for elevating him to the lofty rank of butt pimple. I do however have the right to question his honor or lack thereof.
“Our troops overreacted because of the pressure on them and they killed innocent civilians in cold blood.” Congressman John Murtha, USMC Retired
Those words are what the Congressman had to say about his fellow Marines concerning Haditha. This incident was a fabrication from the outset based on a story planted by a propagandist and bought hook-line and sinker by the likes of the New York Times. Hyperventilating, they had found their Iraq Mi Lai and the Congressman was going to ride that horse right along with the rest of his anti-war colleagues. There is a little hitch however. Of the 8 Marines whose lives Murtha and the press helped to destroy, charges were dismissed outright against 5 of them, 1 was acquitted of all charges at trial, charges were recently dismissed against the most senior officer due to undue command influence and only one remaining awaits trial. Of course, the alleged atrocity was in every newspaper and Murtha’s face was in front of all the friendly talk show cameras expressing his outrage. Now that the case has practically crumbled to pieces and as the Marines slandered by Murtha and the press are declared innocent one after another there is not a single word. Dead silence. It should anger every American that honorable men and women routinely receive such treatment from the press and politicians.
It really added insult to injury for me with the latest Supreme Court, or is it now the Politburo, atrocity committed against the United States of America. When we capture bin Laden now, according to the decision, we will have to bring him here and give him the rights afforded any United States citizen under the Constitution. When a collection of people with lifetime appointments have suicidal ideations for our country, then the treatment that our Service men and women receive from politicians and the press should not be too shocking. It does not matter who is in the Whitehouse because the Supreme Politburo of the United States has usurped his or her constitutional authority as Commander in Chief. Every enemy prisoner of war taken on any battlefield now has rights under the Constitution of the United States.
“I decapitated with my blessed right hand the head of the American Jew, Daniel Pearl, in the city of Karachi, Pakistan. For those who would like to confirm, there are pictures of me on the Internet holding his head.” - Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
KSM as he is called in the US press. Isn’t it nice how we give them neat little identifiers like UBL? I can remember when initials were used to affectionately identify former US presidents, JFK, FDR, LBJ, dubya… well maybe not always affectionately. KSM who we have raised from the level of brutal murderer to “mastermind” now has the rights that you have. Unlike our Marines, he now has the presumption of innocence. Let that sink in some. While you are doing that, see if you can find any instance where Jack Murtha talked about him killing innocent civilians in cold blood, or that Dick Durbin ever called him a Nazi, or…
Copyright © J D Pendry 2008 All Rights Reserved
And this butthead Murtha is still a US Congressman?Say it ain't so!!
If you would like to see who this fine man is, go to this Air Force
web site
and look him up:
http://www.af.mil/bios/bio.asp?bioID=5000' Then read below.
Muslim terrorists and the U.S.A. :
A different spin on the war in Iraq : This WAR is REAL
Dr. Vernon Chong, Major General, USAF, Retired
To get out of a difficulty, one usually must go through it. Our country is
now facing the most serious threat to its existence, as we know it,
that we
have faced in your lifetime and mine (which includes WWII).
The deadly seriousness is greatly compounded by the fact that there
are very
few of us who think we can possibly lose this war and even fewer who
realize
what losing really means.
First, let's examine a few basics:
1 When did the threat to us start?
Many will say September 11, 2001. The answer, as far as the United States
is concerned, is 1979, 22 years prior to September 2001, with the
following
attacks on us:
* Iran Embassy Hostages, 1979;
* Beirut, Lebanon Embassy 1983;
* Beirut, Lebanon Marine Barracks 1983;
* Lockerbie, Scotland Pan-Am flight to New York 1988;
* First New York World Trade Center attack 1993;
* Dhahran , Saudi Arabia Khobar Towers Military complex 1996;
* Nairobi , Kenya US Embassy 1998;
* Dares Salaam , Tanzania US Embassy 1998;
* Aden , Yemen USS Cole 2000;
* New York World Trade Center 2001;
* Pentagon 2001.
(Note: during the period from 1981 to 2001 there were 7,581 terrorist
attacks worldwide.)
2 Why were we attacked?
Envy of our position, our success, and our freedoms. The attacks happened
during the administrations of Presidents Carter, Reagan, Bush 1,
Clinton and
Bush 2. We cannot fault either the Republicans or Democrats, as there were
no provocations by any of the presidents or their immediate predecessor,
President Ford.
3 Who were the attackers?
In each case, the attacks on the US were carried out by Muslims.
4 What is the Muslim population of the World?
25%.
5 Isn't the Muslim Religion peaceful?
Hopefully, but that is really not material. There is no doubt that the
predominately Christian population of Germany was peaceful, but under the
dictatorial leadership of Hitler (who was also Christian), that made no
difference. You either went along with the administration or you were
eliminated. There were 5 to 6 million Christians killed by the Nazis for
political reasons (including
7,000 Polish priests).
(seehttp://www.Nazis.testimony.co.uk/7-a.htm
Thus, almost the same number of Christians were killed by the Nazis as the
six million holocaust Jews who were killed by them, and we seldom hear of
anything other than the Jewish atrocities. Although Hitler kept the world
focused on the Jews, he had no hesitancy in killing anyone who got in the
way of his extermination of the Jews or of taking over the world - German,
Christian, or any others.
Same with the Muslim terrorists. They focus the world on the US , but kill
all in the way -- their own people or the Spanish, British, French or
anyone
else. The point here is that, just like the peaceful Germans were of no
protection to anyone from the Nazis, no matter how many peaceful Muslims
there may be, they are no protection for us from the terrorist Muslim
leaders and what they are fanatically bent on doing -- by their own
pronouncements
-- killing all of us 'infidels.' I don't blame the peaceful Muslims. What
would you do if the choice was to remain silent or be killed?
6 So who are we at war with?
There is no way we can honestly respond that it is anyone other than the
Muslim terrorists. Trying to be politically correct and avoid verbalizing
this conclusion can well be fatal. There is no way to win if you don't
clearly recognize and articulate who you are fighting.
So with that background, now to the two major questions:
1 Can we lose this war?
2 What does losing really mean?
If we are to win, we must clearly answer these two pivotal questions:
We can definitely lose this war and, as anomalous as it may sound, the
major
reason we can lose is that so many of us simply do not fathom the
answer to
the second question - What does losing mean?
It would appear that a great many of us think that losing the war means
hanging our heads, bringing the troops home, and going on about our
business, like post-Vietnam. This is as far from the truth as one can get.
What losing really means is:
We would no longer be the premier country in the world. The attacks will
not subside, but, rather, will steadily increase. Remember, they want us
dead, not just quiet. If they had just wanted us quiet, they would not
have
produced an increasing series of attacks against us over the past 18
years.
The plan was, clearly, for terrorists to attack us until we were neutered
and submissive to them.
We would, of course, have no future support from other nations, for
fear of
reprisals and for the reason that they would see; we are impotent and
cannot
help them.
They will pick off the other non-Muslim nations, one at a time. It will be
increasingly easier for them. They already hold Spain hostage. It doesn't
matter whether it was right or wrong for Spain to withdraw its troops from
Iraq . Spain did it because the Muslim terrorists bombed their train and
told them to withdraw the troops. Anything else they want Spain to do will
be done. Spain is finished.
The next will probably be France Our one hope with France is that they
might see the light and realize that if we don't win, they are finished,
too, in that they can't resist the Muslim terrorists without us. However,
it may already be too late for France. France is already 20% Muslim and
fading fast.
Without our support, Great Britain will go. Recently, I read that
there are more mosques in England than churches.
If we lose the war, our production, income, exports, and way of life will
all vanish as we know it. After losing, who would trade or deal with us if
they were threatened by the Muslims? If we can't stop the Muslim
terrorists, how could anyone else?
The radical Muslims fully know what is riding on this war, and
therefore are
completely committed to winning, at any cost. We'd better know it,
too, and
be likewise committed to winning at any cost.
Why do I go on at such lengths about the results of losing? Simple. Until
we recognize the costs of losing, we cannot unite and really put 100%
of our
thoughts and efforts into winning. And it is going to take that 100%
effort
to win.
So, how can we lose the war?
Again, the answer is simple. We can lose the war by 'imploding.' That is,
defeating ourselves by refusing to recognize the enemy and their
purpose and
failing to dig in and lend full support to the war effort. If we are
united, there is no way that we can lose. If we continue to be divided,
there is no way that we can win.
Let me give you a few examples of how we simply don't comprehend the life
and death seriousness of this situation:
President Bush selects Norman Mineta as Secretary of Transportation.
Although all of the terrorist attacks were committed by Muslim men between
17 and 40 years of age, Secretary Mineta refuses to allow profiling. Does
that sound like we are taking this thing seriously? This is war! For the
duration, we are going to have to give up some of the civil rights to
which
we have become accustomed. We had better be prepared to lose some of our
civil rights temporarily or we will most certainly lose all of them
permanently
And don't worry that it is a slippery slope. We gave up plenty of civil
rights during WWII, and immediately restored them after the victory ..
and,
in fact, added many more since that time.
Do I blame President Bush or President Clinton before him?
No, I blame us for blithely assuming we can maintain all of our Political
Correctness and all of our civil rights during this conflict and have a
clean, lawful, honorable war. None of those words apply to war. Get them
out of your head.
Some have gone so far in their criticism of the war and/or the
Administration that it almost seems they would literally like to see us
lose.
I think some actually do. I hasten to add that this isn't because they are
disloyal. It is because they just don't recognize what losing means.
Nevertheless, that conduct gives the impression to the enemy that we are
divided and weakening. It concerns our friends and it does great damage to
our cause.
Of more recent vintage, the uproar fueled by the politicians and media
regarding the treatment of some prisoners of war perhaps exemplifies best
what I am saying. We have recently had an issue involving the treatment of
a few Muslim prisoners of war, by a small group of our military police..
These are the type prisoners who just a few months ago were throwing their
own people off buildings, cutting off their hands, cutting out their
tongues, and otherwise murdering their own just for disagreeing with
Saddam
Hussein.
And, just a few years ago, these same type prisoners chemically killed
400,000 of their own people for the same reason. They are also the same
type of enemy fighters who recently were burning Americans and dragging
their charred corpses through the streets of Iraq And, still more
recently,
the same type of enemy that was and is providing videos to all news
sources
internationally of the beheading of American prisoners they held.
Compare this with some of our press and politicians, who for several days
have thought and talked about nothing else but the 'humiliating' of some
Muslim prisoners -- not burning them, not dragging their charred corpses
through the streets, not beheading them, but 'humiliating' them.
Can they be for real?
The politicians and pundits have even talked of impeachment of the
Secretary
of Defense. If this doesn't show the complete lack of comprehension and
understanding of the seriousness of the enemy we are fighting, the
life and
death struggle we are in, and the disastrous results of losing this war,
nothing can.
To bring our country to a virtual political standstill over this prisoner
issue makes us look like Nero playing his fiddle as Rome burned -- totally
oblivious to what is going on in the real world. Neither we, nor any other
country, can survive this internal strife. Again, I say, this does not
mean
that some of our politicians or media people are disloyal. It simply means
that they are absolutely oblivious to the magnitude of the situation
we are
in and into which the Muslim terrorists have been pushing us for many
years.
These people are a serious and dangerous liability to the war effort. We
must take note of who they are and get them out of office. Remember, the
Muslim terrorists stated goal is to kill all infidels. That translates
into
ALL non-Muslims -- not just in the United States , but throughout the
world. We are the last bastion of defense.
We have been criticized for many years as being 'arrogant.' That charge is
valid. We are arrogant in that we believe that we are so good, powerful,
and smart that we can win the hearts and minds of all those who attack us,
and that, with both hands tied behind our back, we can defeat anything bad
in the world. We can't!
If we don't recognize this, our nation, as we know it, will not
survive, and
no other free country in the world will survive if we are defeated.
And, finally, name any Muslim countries throughout the world that allow
freedom of speech, freedom of thought, freedom of religion, freedom of the
press, equal rights for anyone -- let alone everyone, equal status or any
status for women, or that have been productive in one single way that
contributes to the good of the world.
This has been a long way of saying that we must be united on this war
or we
will be equated in the history books to the self- inflicted fall of the
Roman Empire . If, that is, the Muslim leaders will allow history books to
be written or read.
If we don't win this war right now, keep a close eye on how the
Muslims take
over France in the next 5 years or less. They will continue to
increase the
Muslim population of France and continue to encroach, little by little, on
the established French traditions.
The French will be fighting among themselves over what should or
should not
be done, which will continue to weaken them and keep them from any united
resolve. Doesn't that sound eerily familiar?
Democracies don't have their freedoms taken away from them by some
external
military force. Instead, they give their freedoms away, politically
correct
piece by politically correct piece.
And they are giving those freedoms away to those who have shown,
worldwide,
that they abhor freedom and will not apply it to you or even to
themselves,
once they are in power.
Muslims have universally shown that when they have taken over, they then
start brutally killing each other over who the few will be controlling the
masses.
What is happening in Iraq is a good example. Will we ever stop hearing
from
the politically correct about the 'peaceful Muslims?'
I close on a hopeful note by repeating what I said before: If we are
united, there is no way that we can lose. I hope now, after the election,
the factions in our country will begin to focus on the critical
situation we
are in, and will unite to save our country. It is your future we are
talking about Do whatever you can to preserve it. I reiterate: our
national election is under way.
After reading the above, we all must do this, not only for ourselves, but
for our children, our grandchildren, our country, and our world. Whether
Democrat or Republican, conservative or liberal ... and that includes the
Politicians and media of our country and the free world.
Please forward this to any you feel may want, or NEED to read it. Our
'leaders' in Congress ought to read it, too. There are those who find
fault
with our country, but it is obvious to anyone who truly thinks through
this,
that we must UNITE!
Lastly, I wish to add: at the risk of offending, I sincerely think that
anyone who rejects this as just another political rant, or doubts the
seriousness of th is issue, or just deletes it without sending it on,
may be part of the problem.
Thought you might enjoy seeing Obama's pants on Fire !!.
and this is just the beginning . . .OBAMA'S LAUNDRY LIST OF 58 LIES.1.) Selma Got Me Born - LIAR, your parents felt safe enough to haveyou in 1961 - Selma had no effect on your birth, as Selma was in1965.2.) Father Was A Goat Herder - LIAR, he was a privileged, welleducated youth, who went on to work with the Kenyan Government.3.) Father Was A Proud Freedom Fighter - LIAR, he was part of one ofthe most corrupt and violent governments Kenya has ever had4.) My Family Has Strong Ties To African Freedom - LIAR, your cousinRaila Odinga has created mass violence in attempting to overturn alegitimate election in 2007, in Kenya. It is the first widespreadviolence in decades.5.) My Grandmother Has Always Been A Christian - LIAR, she does herdaily Salat prayers at 5am according to her own interviews. Not tomention, Christianity wouldn't allow her to have been one of 14wives to 1 man.6.) My Name is African Swahili - LIAR, your name is Arabic and'Baraka' (from which Barack came) means 'blessed' in thatlanguage. Hussein is also Arabic and so is Obama.7.) I Never Practiced Islam - LIAR, you practiced it daily at school,where you were registered as a Muslim and kept that faith for 31years,until your wife made you change, so you could run for office.8.) My School In Indonesia Was Christian - LIAR, you were registeredas Muslim there and got in trouble in Koranic Studies for makingfaces (check your own book).9.) I Was Fluent In Indonesian - LIAR, not one teacher says you couldspeak the language.10.) Because I Lived In Indonesia, I Have More Foreign Experience -LIAR, you were there from the ages of 6 to 10, and couldn't evenspeak the language. What did you learn, how to study the Koran andwatch cartoons.11.) I Am Stronger On Foreign Affairs - LIAR, except for Africa(surprise) and the Middle East (bigger surprise), you have never beenanywhere else on the planet and thus have NO experience with ourclosest allies.12.) I Blame My Early Drug Use On Ethnic Confusion - LIAR, you werequite content in high school to be Barry Obama, no mention of Kenyaand no mention of struggle to identify - your classmates said youwere just fine.13.)An Ebony Article Moved Me To Run For Office - LIAR, Ebony has yetto find the article you mention in your book. It doesn't, and neverdid, exist.14.) A Life Magazine Article Changed My Outlook On Life - LIAR, Lifehas yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn't,and never did, exist.15.) I Won't Run On A National Ticket In '08 - LIAR, here youare, despite saying, live on TV, that you would not have enoughexperience by then, and you are all about having experience first.16.) Present Votes Are Common In Illinois - LIAR, they are common forYOU, but not many others have 130 NO VOTES.17.) Oops, I Misvoted - LIAR, only when caught by church groups anddemocrats, did you beg to change your misvote.18.) I Was A Professor Of Law - LIAR, you were a senior lecturer ONLEAVE.19.) I Was A Constitutional Lawyer - LIAR, you were a senior lecturerON LEAVE.20.) Without Me, There Would Be No Ethics Bill - LIAR, you didn'twrite it,introduce it, change it, or create it.21.) The Ethics Bill Was Hard To Pass - LIAR, it took just 14 daysfrom start to finish.22.) I Wrote A Tough Nuclear Bill - LIAR, your bill was rejected byyour own party for its pandering and lack of all regulation - mainlybecause of your Nuclear Donor, Exelon, from which David Axelrod came.23.) I Have Released My State Records - LIAR, as of March, 2008,state bills you sponsored or voted for have yet to be released,exposing all the special interests pork hidden within.24.) I Took On The Asbestos Altgeld Gardens Mess - LIAR, you werepart of a large group of people who remedied Altgeld Gardens. Youfailed to mention anyone else but yourself, in your books.25.) My Economics Bill Will Help America - LIAR, your 111 economicpolicies were just combined into a proposal which lost 99-0, and evenYOU voted against your own bill.26.) I Have Been A Bold Leader In Illinois - LIAR, even your ownsupporters claim to have not seen BOLD action on your part.27.) I Passed 26 Of My Own Bills In One Year - LIAR, they were notYOUR bills, but rather handed to you, after their creation by afellow Senator, to assist you in a future bid for higher office.28.) No One Contacted Canada About NAFTA - LIAR, the CandianGovernment issued the names and a memo of the conversation yourcampaign had with them.29.) I Am Tough On Terrorism - LIAR, you missed the Iran Resolutionvote on terrorism and your good friend Ali Abunimah supports thedestruction of Israel.30.) I Am Not Acting As President Yet - LIAR, after the NAFTA Memo, adead terrorist in the FARC, in Colombia, was found with a letterstating how you and he were working together on getting FARCrecognized officially.31.) I Didn't Run Ads In Florida - LIAR, you allowed national adsto run 8-12 times per day for two weeks - and you still lost.32.) I Won Michigan - LIAR, no you didn't.33.) I won Nevada - LIAR, no you did not.34.) I Want All Votes To Count - LIAR, you said let the delegatesdecide.35.) I Want Americans To Decide - LIAR, you prefer caucuses thatlimit the vote, confuse the voters, force a public vote, and onlyoperate during small windows of time.36.) I passed 900 Bills in the State Senate - LIAR, you passed 26,most of which you didn't write yourself.37.) My Campaign Was Extorted By A Friend - LIAR, that friend isthreatening to sue if you do not stop saying this. Obama has stoppedsaying this.38.) I Believe In Fairness, Not Tactics - LIAR, you used tactics toeliminate Alice Palmer from running against you.39.) I Don't Take PAC Money - LIAR, you take loads of it.40.) I don't Have Lobbysists - LIAR, you have over 47 lobbyists,and counting.41.) My Campaign Had Nothing To Do With The 1984 Ad - LIAR, your owncampaign worker made the ad on his Apple in one afternoon.42.) My Campaign Never Took Over MySpace - LIAR, Tom, who startedMySpace issued a warning about this advertising to MySpace clients.43.) I Inspire People With My Words - LIAR, you inspire people withother people's words.44.) I Have Passed Bills In The U.S. Senate - LIAR, you have passed ABILL in the U.S. Senate - for Africa, which shows YOUR priorities.45.) I Have Always Been Against Iraq - LIAR, you weren't in officeto vote against it AND you have voted to fund it every single time,unlike Kucinich, who seems to be out gutting you Obama. You also seemto be stepping back from your departure date - AGAIN.46.) I Have Always Supported Universal Health Care - LIAR, your planleaves us all to pay the 15,000,000 who don't have to buy it.47.) I Only Found Out About My Investment Conflicts Via Mail - LIAR,both companies you site as having sent you letters about thisconflict have no record of any such letter ever being created orsent.48.) I Am As Patriotic As Anyone - LIAR, you won't wear a flag pinand you don't put your hand over your heart during the Anthem.49.) My Wife Didn't Mean What She Said About Pride In Country -LIAR, your wife's words follow lock-step in the vain of Wright andFarrahkan, in relation to their contempt and hatred of America.50.) Wal-Mart Is A Company I Wouldn't Support - LIAR, your wife hasreceived nearly a quater of a million dollars through Treehouse,whichis connected to Wal-Mart.51.) Treehouse Is A Small Company - LIAR, the CEO of Treehouse lastyear, made more than the CEO of Wal-Mart, according to publicrecords.52.) University Of Chicago Hospital Pay Is Fair - LIAR, your wife'spay raise was nearly 150% her already bloated rate and the hospitalisa Non-Profit Hospital, which made $100,000,000 in the last 3 years.They overcharge blacks VS whites for services, and overchargeeveryone in general by 538%!53.)I Barely Know Rezko - Only 5 Billed Hours - LIAR, you have knownhim for 17 years, and decided to do a real estate deal with himduring a time when he was proven to be under investigation. Despitethis, you divided your property and had them take off $300K beforethe mortgage problems started. Then Rezko's wife buys the lotbeside it that you can't afford, saving you $625,000.54.) My Donations Have Been Checked Thoroughly - LIAR, you only gaveback Hsu ($72K) and Rezko ($150K) their money when publically calledon their involvement in your campaigns.55.) My Church Is Like Any Other Christian Church - LIAR, your churchis so extreme, the pastor who married you, Rev. Wright, just got doneblaming the US for 9/11 and named LOUIS FARRAHKAN their person of theyear.56.) I Disagree With My Church All The Time - LIAR, you still haveyet to repudiate Wright, who married you and your wife, and you stilldonate large sums of money to assist the church in furthering itsmessage - HATE & REVENGE. You donated in 2006 alone, $22,500 to thechurch that you so terribly disagree with. That is nearly $500 PERWEEK - that sure is disagreement, Senator Obama.(JUDGEMENT????!!!!!!!!)57.) I Have Clean Connections Despite Rezko - LIAR, you are not onlyconnected to Exelon and Rezko, you are also connected to Hillary PACsupporter Mr. Hsu, AND an Iraqi Billionaire of ill repute, NadhmiAuchi, who ripped off people in the Food For Oil, Iraqi deal. SeemsMr. Auchi may have helped Obama buy his million dollar property longbefore Obama had millions of dollars. Wonder what favors Mr. Auchiexpects, when Obama leaves Iraq free to be taken over by specialinterests such as him.58.) I never heard sermons like Rev. Wright's, that have been invideos all day, You Tube - LIAR! 3 days later during your Mea CulpaBS speech you said "Did I hear controversial statements while I satin that church? Yes I did."
--
MESSAGE TO THE ISLAMIC JIHAD
جدري أ على الإسلامية الارهابيه ويدعم
NC GOE EAGLES NEST
http://www.myspace.com/samek1105
GATHERING OF EAGLES
gatheringofeagles.orgThis come courtesy of GOE,North Carolina.BlockheadGathering of Eagles Florida
> Time Magazine -
>
> Your most recent cover indicates just what complete tree hugging
> idiots and wimps you truly are. It is well known that your left
> wing bias runs rampant throughout your publications. However, to
> desecrate the most famous of pictures to evolve from WWII, and by
> association disrespect every fighting American serviceman and woman
> throughout U.S. history (particularly the Marine Corps), is beyond
> reprehensible. You have no shame and are utter cowards.
>
> Nearly 7,000 Marines died in that one Pacific island battle for Iwo
> Jima over 60 years ago so that anti-American scum like you could
> grow up and live a full life - only to waste what was given you and
> prove your lunacy. Those Marines and Joe Rosenthal, the
> photographer, had more courage in their little finger than the
> entire staff of Time magazine could muster in decades. Why don't
> you do the rest of patriotic America a favor and "take your tree
> and stick it where the sun don't shine." If you are so concerned
> about global warming, instead of the real threat at hand by radical
> muslims to western civilization, then I suggest you stop publishing
> your rag altogether. Can you imagine the trees you'll save by the
> lack of use of paper? That should give your "global warming" crap
> a real boost. Guess we'll then have to find something else to put
> at the bottom of the bird cages, though.
>
> It's a damn shame that phonies like you are allowed to live and
> enjoy the freedoms in this country given to you by those millions
> who never had a chance to have a full life. I don't ever expect
> that you will appreciate the sacrifices that have been made on your
> behalf. Stay hidden behind your desks, it's where you belong.
> I've got two final words for you... and they ain't "Happy Birthday."
>
> Roger Herman
> Former Marine (Vietnam '67-'68, '70-71)
> San Diego, CA


I don't know about Y'all,but once again,I find Myself agreeing with the writer of
this,too bad I don't have a birdcage.
LET ME SEE IF WE HAVE THIS STRAIGHT:
HIS FATHER WAS A KENYAN, MOSLEM, BLACK- WE HAVE SEEN PICTURES OF HIS AFRICAN 'FAMILYHIS MOTHER IS A KANSAN, ATHIEST, WHITE- WHERE ARE THE PICTURES OF HIS KANSAN, WHITE MOTHER AND HIS WHITE GRANDPARENTS WHO RAISED HIM.
HIS FATHER DESERTED HIS MOTHER AND HIM WHEN HE WAS VERY YOUNG AND WENT BACK TO HIS FAMILY IN KENYA
HIS MOTHER MARRIED AN INDONESIAN MOSLEM AND TOOK HIM TO JAKARTA WHERE HE WAS SCHOOLED IN A MOSLEM SCHOOL
HIS MOTHER RETURNED TO HAWAII AND HE WAS RAISED BY HIS WHITE KANSAN GRANDPARENTS
HE LATER WENT TO THE BEST HIGH DOLLAR SCHOOLS, HOW?
HE LIVES IN A $1.4 MILLION DOLLAR HOUSE THAT HE ACQUIRED THROUGH A DEAL WITH A WEALTHY FUND RAISER. HOW?
HE 'WORKED' AS A CIVIL RIGHTS ACTIVIST IN CHICAGO- HAS NEVER HELD A PRODUCTIVE JOB. THE PRESIDENCY IS NOT A CIVIL RIGHTS POST NOR IS IT SUBJECT TO AFFIRMATIVE ACTION SET ASIDES
HE ENTERED POLITICS AT THE STATE LEVEL AND THEN THE NATIONAL LEVEL WHERE HE HAS MINIMAL EXPERIENCE
HE IS PROUD OF HIS 'AFRICAN HERITAGE' BUT IT SEEMS THAT HIS ONLY AFRICAN CONNECTION WAS THAT HIS AFRICAN FATHER GOT A WHITE GIRL PREGNANT AND
DESERTED HER. I DIDN'T KNOW THAT SPERM CARRIED A 'CULTURAL' GENE.
WHERE IS THE PRIDE IN HIS WHITE CULTURE?
HE GOES TO A 'AFROCENTRIC' CHURCH THAT HATES wHITES, HATES JEWS, AND BLAMES AMERICA FOR ALL THE WORLDS PERCEIVED FAULTS
AND THEN REPEATEDLY COVERS UP FOR THE PASTOR AND THE CHURCH HE CLAIMS THAT HE COULD NOT CONFRONT HIS PASTOR BUT HE WANTS US TO BELIEVE THAT HE CAN CONFRONT NORTH KOREA AND IRAN, RIGHT!!!
YEAH, WE SEE HOW HE COULD BE A UNITER AND BRING US TOGETHER. WE THINK THE HOPE IS THAT HE HOPES NO ONE WILL PUT THE PIECES TOGETHER.
I don,t know about Y'all,but the pieces look pretty obvious to Me....
|
Why We Fight
Our most conservative estimates indicate our Islamic enemy is but 15 percent of the world-wide Islamic population. Not much you say? Well, that's 15 percent of 1.6 billion people or 240 million who want America gone! They have a Grand Strategy and a 100-year plan to reestablish an Islamic Caliphate, under Islamic, Sharia law and dominate the world. Far-fetched you say...let's look at some facts: comparative numbers of Christians versus Muslims is tilting in favor of Muslims (25 percent versus 30 percent by 2025 at current birth rate); Islam is growing about 2.9 percent per year, which is faster than the total world population which increases at about 2.3 percent annually; the West's population is top-heavy, (i.e., our ratio of youth to elderly is low; that of Muslim populations is the opposite). The bottom line: as the Muslim population grows, so does the number of "bad guys" comprising that aforementioned 15 percent! Many do not realize that this is only the latest iteration of an age-old struggle between Western Civilization and Islamic fascism. Some say we have been at war with these vermin since 1979 when Iran unlawfully held Americans hostage for 444 days. Others have said we've been at war with these Jihadists since the bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut, Lebanon in 1983. But let's look at the facts of history. What many of us do not realize is Western Civilization has been in a cyclic war with them since the Islamic Moors invaded Christian Spain in April of 711 with a force of 18,000 Jihadists--since then, there have been three cycles of warfare spanning 1,296 years! Osama Bin Laden has referred to us Christians in the west disparagingly as "Crusaders," as if we started this fight or if the term was something to be ashamed of! And so the Islamic extremists and mainstream media would have the world believe. But the truth is the opposite--there would be no Christian Crusades without Islamic aggression in the first place, for the Crusades were in response to Muslim expansion by force to take over Europe, Jerusalem and the Christian Holy Lands. Here's the big picture: in the 16th century, Judaism and Christianity reconciled with the modern world. The rabbis, priests and scholars found a way to reconcile and move forward. Religion remained at the center of life, but church and state became separate. The Rule of law, economic liberty, individual rights and human rights emerged as defining points of modern Western civilization. These concepts started with Ancient Greece but didn't take off until this reconciliation. When that happened, it unleashed the scientific revolution and the greatest outpouring of art, literature and music the world has ever known. Islam has never had their renaissance. True enough, Islam consists mostly of moderate people, but when the radicals are in charge, Islam invariably attacks Western society. As I mentioned before, Islam first attacked Western civilization in the year 711, and later in the 17th century. By 1683, the Muslim Turks (from the Ottoman Empire) were literally at the gates of Vienna. It was in Vienna that the climactic battle between Islam and Western civilization took place. The West won and went forward. Islam lost and went backward. As a matter of fact, the date of that battle was September 11th--and that is no coincidence. To date, the radicals in Islam have not yet found a way to reconcile with the modern world and, as such, they constitute the most powerful "retrograde" influence in the world today--and until they do reconcile, this cycle of war will not go away. Fact: the history of Islam is a history of violence and provocation. It is the most violent religion on the face of the earth and is the largest practitioner of sexual and racial segregation of any religion in the world. Furthermore, Islam doesn't mean "peace" it means "submission"--and unless you are born into it, statistically speaking, you become part of it by being made to submit to it. Now, the terrorism cycle we are in is the third attack or "Third Jihad" on Western civilization by radical Islam. To deal with the current cycle of warfare, we are doing two things. First, our armed forces are in 30 countries around the world hunting down terrorist groups and dealing with them. This gets very little publicity. By the way, our Air Force is killing most of these terrorists--more than the other services combined. Second, we are taking military action in Afghanistan and Iraq. This is inundated with media coverage. People can argue about whether the war in Iraq is right or wrong. However, the underlying strategy behind the war is to use our military to remove the radicals from power and give the moderates a chance. Our hope is that, over time, the moderates will find a way to bring Islam forward into the 21st century and reconcile it with Western civilization. That's what our involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan is all about. So, let us make no mistake, as some in our society have, that these Islamic-Fascists can be appeased or negotiated with or even treated with dignity--they cannot. They are like Hitler and his Fascist Nazis who plunged the world into our bloodiest war in history--fascists who our fathers and grandfathers have faced, fought and defeated. In characterizing our enemy, Vice President Dick Cheney had it right when he said: "This is an enemy that holds no territory, defends no population, is unconstrained by rules of warfare, and respects no law or morality. They cannot be deterred, contained, appeased or negotiated with; they can only be destroyed--and that is the business at hand." The Jihadist's nearer-term, tactical objectives are currently in-progress and unfolding before our eyes: (1) Maintain their current safe-haven on Afghan-Pakistani border, (2) develop safe-havens in Syria and Iran, (3) expand safe-havens in African Sahel, (4) expand safe-havens in Somalia & Southeast Asia, (5) establish new safe havens in Latin America, (Note: WorldNet Daily article this past October details how the dictator, Hugo Chavez, in Venezuela is providing Al Qaeda cells with new Hispanic identities and facilitating the flow of Al Qaeda cells across our Southern border), (6) take advantage of our open society to strike when and where they choose. Islamic Fascism's near-to-mid-term strategic objectives are straight forward: (1) continue to advocate jihad all over the globe, (2) get the U.S. and Western influence out of Southwest Asia, (3) overthrow the "apostate" Islamic governments that have compromised and cooperated with the West, (4) gain Weapon of Mass Destruction capabilities, and (5) control the oil resources in Southwest Asia. Finally, the longer term Jihadist goals are to: (1) expand/secure geographical areas currently under Muslim rule/Sharia law into Europe, Africa and Southest Asia (2) continue to establish safe havens in the West, (3) bankrupt and exhaust the US and remaining Western powers, (4) eliminate Israel, (5) reestablish the Caliphate and establish total Sharia Law throughout the globe. So let us not forget why we serve and why we fight that we may not lose heart if victory seems distant. We shall prevail. The President gave us our marching orders Sept. 20, 2001, when he said: "Great harm has been done to us. We have suffered great loss. And in our grief and anger we have found our mission and our moment. Freedom and fear are at war. The advance of human freedom--the great achievement of our time, and the great hope of every time--now depends on us. Our Nation--this generation--will lift a dark threat of violence from our people and our future. We will rally the world to this cause by our efforts, by our courage. We will not tire, we will not falter, and we will not fail." America stands in the face of evil and darkness. We are the last, best hope for a freedom of man. We are that "Shining City upon a hill" that Ronald Reagan spoke of and we will not lose hope or faith in that ideal. America is not perfect, but she is still the land of the free and the home of the brave! And let us never forget that. And so, the glorious burden of defending America, and raising the next generation of Airmen to do the same, has fallen upon us. We must stand together in this urgent, sacred duty and not lose sight of this supreme purpose. And lastly, we must ever be mindful not forget the words of warning from The Gipper, Ronald Reagan, who said: "Freedom is never more than one generation from extinction--we didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on to them to do the same. Or, one day, we will spend our sunset years telling our children and children's children what it was once like in the United States when men were free." |
It seems to Me I've read this before,somewhere,like some of My other posts,but I also feel now is
the time to pay close attention to philosophies such as this.
Dan
|
Subject: Fw: Obama Explains National Anthem
Spread this as far and as wide as you can. The fate of our beloved country depends on it.
The late President Reagon is quoted as saying; "Freedom is never more than one generation from extinction.
If this person ( I refuse to call him a man) is elected to the highest office in our nation, we can kiss our freedom good-by!
Rev Hawk Received from Joe Blick,a Navy Cross recipient.
Semper Fi,
Hello folks -- I received this yesterday and could not write anything until today after I cooled off some. I would have rather that Barack Hussein claimed ignorance when he didn't render honors to our flag.
I don't know where to start on this, let's start with all the fabrications of the Democrats when the photo first appeared. IT WAS DOCTORED, THEY SAID, IT WAS MADE TO LOOK AS THOUGH HE WAS NOT RENDERING HONORS, THEY SAID. A few days later a video clip was produced depicting the entire anthem, they could not say that the video was doctored -- Now the truth comes out, he refused and refuses to honor the flag of our country, the flag that so many died for and that many of us have fought and shed blood for.
Furthermore, he considers himself above the law and violates a United States Code stated below. He had already stated that he would not wear the US Flag on his lapel, "that patriotism is in the heart." We know why there, his anti-American church has a doctrine of "a non-negotiable allegiance to Africa."He further shows his ignorance of our national anthem by saying that it is aggressive in nature -- How about one of you democrats sending him the history of the National Anthem and how the Americans were under attack for days while Frances Scott Keye was writing it sitting off shore on a frigate, and to his amazement our flag was still flying through all the bombs bursting in air. This may be a well educated, smooth talking politician, but he didn't pay attention in history class.
He is slapping every veteran in the face by his actions and words and should be tried for violating the US Code about rendering proper honors to our flag, or treason. I don't know about you but I am outraged over this explanation and how he has the audacity to think that he is above every other American in this country. This man does not deserve to run for President of our United States and damn sure doesn't deserve to be Commander in Chief of our Armed Forces. For that matter, with his beliefs how can be a productive Senator, oh forgot, he hasn't been. If he continues along his present path, I fear for his safety, there are many veterans out there suffering from severe PTSD who takes our country and it's flag very serioiusly, to heart. They have PTSD because of their patriotism, they did their duty and will never be the same. And then this unpatriotic ass comes out with this crap.
How can anyone with an trickling of patriotic blood in their veins even consider this poor excuse for an American for our country's highest position?
Send this to everyone that you know, maybe some of the sheep will take their blinders off and see the light.
Semper Venting and really pissed, Semper Fi,
Need to read. I can't understand how any American can vote for this "PERSON". He has no respect for our FLAG. Which respents our NATION and it's people.
Wants to CHANGE our NATIONAL ANTHEM. The Flag that covers our VETERANS COFFINS and is given to their next of KIN. God Help us.
SEMPER FI
Please read !!!!!!
Obama Explains National Anthem Stance On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:48:04 -0400, "LTG Bill Ginn" USAF ret forwarded: Hot on the heels of his explanation for why he no longer wears a flag pin, presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama was forced to explain why he doesn't follow protocol when the National Anthem is played. According to the United States Code, Title 36, Chapter 10, Sec. 171, During rendition of the national anthem when the flag is displayed, all present except those in uniform are expected to stand at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart. "As I've said about the flag pin, I don't want to be perceived as taking sides," Obama said. "There are a lot of peopl e in the world to whom the American flag is a symbol of oppression. And the anthem it self conveys a war-like message. You know, the bombs bursting in air and all. It should be swapped for something less parochial and less bellicose. I like the song 'I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing.' If that were our anthem, then I might salute it." "I don't think my church is actually particularly controversial." - Barack Obama. ......................................... comment: If someone had told me 64 years ago, as I was roaring down the runway in the |